Now What: IOS 14 & Your Ads
Updated: Sep 8
April 27th was the day that online advertising began to fundamentally change. Although most people think that it’s a war between Facebook & Apple (Since Facebook is the most vocal opponent), it’s actually much bigger than this. IOS 14 was a one-sided update forced down by Apple that essentially promotes one agenda: User privacy is back in the hands of the user. The user will determine who has access to his data and at what levels.I wrote a previous post that details those changes and what they will mean to advertisers which you can access here.
The point of this post is to provide an update almost 5 months after the initial update and to examine how it’s impacting advertisers now and what to expect in the future. So to start, I think this screenshot says it all. It seems obvious, but only until Apple stepped in, whether companies like Facebook could track your data off of Facebook was never your choice.
This in my opinion is by far the deadliest update that bites off the ability to learn and collect data off of what you do online for companies like Facebook, Tiktok, Youtube, and any other app for that matter. Think about how many data points they had. These advertising empires could map out your complete online behavior without you realizing it and now with a click on a button, you can shut that down. And the results? They couldn’t be deadlier. Advertisers across the board already claim that their advertising campaigns took a nasty turn but I think that the real picture won’t be revealed officially for years as they got their own internal reasons for disclosing the real numbers, but no one can argue how massive the impact is for advertisers.
Although advertising platforms are the ones that are “taking the hit”, it’s the small advertisers that ultimately pay the price. Virtually all advertising costs online are regulated by supply and demand between available ad space and the amount advertisers are willing to pay for that space. You would think that if advertisers are getting a lower return on their investment they will spend less money on ads, but that isn’t exactly the case. First, advertisers might be willing to compromise for a lower profit margin and continue to spend the same amounts of money on ads to generate a lower return.
Then, if that’s not sustainable it will take a long period of time for them to accept that it’s no longer as efficient and slowly stop dropping spend to a point where it might make some ad spaces become less competitive and sell for a lower cost. Again, that might not be the case for all platforms as new industries might emerge that might be willing to pay higher amounts to reach users on the platforms, but it’s safe to assume that if the performance of the ads drops, advertisers will drop spend as well in the long term.
So what does Apple really want?
Well, money is the short answer because they are a business, and businesses the size of Apple don’t really tend to have values, they tend to just care about one thing – growing their share price. That being said, there are long-term and short-term goals. The short-term goal here was to stop giving free access to data from users that are using Apple devices, the long-term goal might be reselling that data in a way that what used to be free for advertising platforms, will now cost money. Yes, many of you might think that Apple is out there to protect your privacy by making it up to you to decide what data advertisers can access about you, and one part of my brain wants to believe it, while the other part says, “wait the first iPhone was launched in 2007, it took them 14 years to remember to take care of user privacy?”
Karma is a bitch. Platforms like Facebook have been extremely verbal in their disagreement and actually tried to get the support of small businesses to go against Apple in a sarcastic and ugly way. They did this because they realized the same thing that advertisers realized about their platform, what used to be free will now cost money. That endless invasive data that they used to collect for free, will soon have a heavy toll. The same strategy that they used, is now being played against them. Think about it, businesses used to get massive organic reach on Facebook and Instagram to a point where their businesses depended on it. Industries were born as a result of this free traffic.
Then came along updates that terminated that free reach and forced businesses to pay for what they once received for free. Kind of like what Apple is planning to do. The way they do it might be different but the idea is the same.
Most meaningful changes that took place:
If you ask me, there are a lot of little changes that have very little impact over advertisers that perhaps are emphasized to cover some of the bigger changes, so let’s review:
Users are able to ask apps not to track their activity across other apps and websites. I don’t know who wrote this, but to use the word ‘ask’ instead of ‘stop’ has elements of disgust in my opinion, as we need to ask their permission to stop doing something that most users weren’t even aware of. Like they are doing us a favor. I am assuming that if a poll was done most users would say they weren’t even aware that they were being followed and tracked, and Apple wants you to ask the apps if it’s ok that you want your data to remain private. Crazy, I know. The results here were extreme especially in the US & other English-speaking countries where Apple holds a big share of the consumer market. Think of how many data points were lost.
Apple only allows advertisers to track meaningful conversions. If previously platforms like Facebook could track users down for 28 days after viewing an ad (without clicking on it) and reporting back to advertisers when you made a purchase or a sign-up, now they are limited to 7 days after a user clicked and 1 day after a user viewed an ad. That’s a massive difference. It’s massive because if for example, 30% of the reported sales and remove happened after 7 days, it’s going to mean there is going to be a huge drop in what these platforms are able to report under the return on ad spend (ROAS) which will lead to advertisers dropping their spend because of low performance. In my opinion, this is something that should have been done by the advertising platforms from the start. But obviously, they wanted to attribute whatever they possibly could so advertisers could spend more money.
API tracking is not the answer. When I discuss this topic, a lot of my friends in the advertising space claim that API tracking was created to address the issues of users opting out but that’s not the case. API tracking transmits more data without relying on cookies or ad blocks in the browser, but once a user says he doesn’t want to be tracked and wants his data private, they still must respect that if they don’t want to be banned. So, users’ info will still be private in that event.
Breakdowns by demographics and regions were blocked out. This part I don’t really understand, but the exact breakdown of the demographics and their locations are not specified when you want to examine your results. If previously you were able for example to filter the sales or conversions by country or demographics, now that’s blocked. Perhaps another possible set of data that apple wants to later resale. Advertisers were the ones who got affected here most and I don’t think it has much to do with user privacy, but then again, go figure.
Delayed reporting. To “protect” users, if before the IOS 14 update you could see conversions being reported in your ad dashboard minutes after they happen, now it can take days. Not a big deal if you ask me, but might be confusing for those who expect to see the data right away and analyze and make changes daily.
Limited events & domain verification. These two changes are more technical and less meaningful in my opinion. You must verify your domain associated with your tracking pixel to prove that you own it and you’re not just randomly advertising websites you don’t own. In addition, you’re limited to the number of tracking events ( purchases, add to cart, sign ups etc..) that you can use in your tracking pixels. In simple terms, if you wanted to track every little event that happened on your website to get as much data as possible, now you are limited to 8 events. Not a big deal in my opinion as most advertisers use 1-4 events.
Other small stuff. Then we got some less meaningful stuff like the size of audiences that you previously used became smaller which they recommend you to go as broad as possible when it comes to selecting your audiences. Also Facebook announced that it will use statistical modeling when they are not able to properly track results which means that results won’t always be 100% accurate and some results might be reported based on sampling data and predictions and not exactly based on what actually happened.
Email marketing is next.
If you think it will change with apps and websites only, don’t close the article yet. On the next update of IOS 15 (exact date hasn’t been revealed yet) email tracking will also be limited. Apple announced a new feature for email privacy called “called Mail Privacy Protection” which protects users who use apple mail (initially) from giving access to their data and privacy. Mail privacy will prevent companies like Mailchimp and Klavyio from entering pixels into the emails that they send which they use to collect data on such as who opened and who clicked and purchased from the email and so on. It also includes information on what apps have viewed your information and how many times and allows you to hide your email and protect you from spamming. In my opinion, whether there is a long term interest here, this action has been long called for as email has been compromised by spammers and unwanted emails for such a long time. This step to me feels like a step in the right direction to protect our emails from spam and misuse of our privacy and personal data.
What the future holds for paid advertising.
Most of my writing is not backed strictly by hard facts and case studies, but more based on my own experience and all the data that I have accessed, but in my opinion, it is worth reading and examining, otherwise, I wouldn’t write it.
In 5 months, advertising online changed dramatically. The levels of panic that we’ve witnessed both publicly led by companies like Facebook and both of what I’ve seen by talking to people from the inside, says a lot not only about the present but also about concerns in the future. From the data that I have access to, the last 3 months have been extremely challenging for advertisers. Some might be related to the post-covid era where offline retail is back and people spent more money than they normally do, so they started pulling back, but mainly I believe it has to do with the IOS 14 updates. Algorithms and advertising platforms that have been around for years are trying to rebound after a devastating impact on their systems. Quarter 4 is here now and it’s historically the best quarter for retail, so many advertisers are anticipating a good turnaround. I personally believe that magic won’t happen and even though Apple might have long-term plans on how they plan to monetize their data, we’re still moving to a user-first privacy online advertising. I think that more limitations will come in the future and advertising platforms like Facebook & Google will have to adapt to advertising models that rely less on real-time user data and more on statistical modeling reports. In other words, much of the results that will be reported in the future will be estimated and based on sample sizes and not based on actual results provided.
If this wave of user opt-out continues, advertising platforms will be forced to be more upfront with the fact that they want to collect and sell your data to advertisers to make money and perhaps offer incentives to participate. For advertisers, it would mean that targeting and delivery will be less centric around “buyers” and more scattered broadly around all users on the platform. It will mean that what you’re reaching is not that accurate, but the cost to reach will also drop. This could potentially lead to a lower cost per visitor on your website but also a lower conversion rate. I think that it will also lead to more confidentiality among direct competition as the same information and method that helped you reach your potential buyers also helped your direct competitors in the same way.
It’s been five months since the Apple IOS 14 privacy update limited apps like Facebook and Google’s abilities to track your data. The effects of this update have already been felt in the online advertising industry as advertisers have been reporting that their campaigns have already taken a turn for the worse.
The Apple IOS 14 update has caused a cascade of changes throughout the industry: Most notably, Apple users now have the ability to ‘ask’ applications to not track their data, which many users are choosing to do. The 28-day view-through conversion algorithm is now limited to seven days for seven days after a user clicked on the ad and only one day after the user viewed the ad. The ability to filter conversions by demographic is also no longer possible. Lastly, conversion reporting takes several days rather than nearly instantaneously.
Why would Apple do this? At a glance, it appears that Apple genuinely cares about your privacy and wants their users to be protected from the free-for-all data access that mega corporations like Google and Facebook had from your devices. The underlying objectives are a bit more murky. It’s possible that Apple attempts to collect the data themselves and sell it off to advertising platforms at a premium. Their long-term goals are unclear, but make no mistake that their goals are motivated by their share prices.